Why We Don't Use Antifoul on Our Boat
- Damian Harris
- Sep 19, 2024
- 2 min read
Introduction
In today's video, we're going to discuss three main reasons why we don't use antifoul on our boat, Antoinette. Antifoul is a coating applied to the underwater hull of a boat to prevent marine organisms like barnacles and algae from attaching and slowing the boat down.
Reason 1: Cost
The first and most obvious reason is cost. For a boat like Antoinette, there are three primary costs associated with antifoul:
Initial Application: This can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $6,000 for a boat of her size.
Annual Reapplication: Every year, you need to reapply antifoul, which can cost around $2,000 to $3,000.
Running Costs: Antifoul can increase drag, leading to reduced fuel efficiency and higher fuel costs.
Reason 2: Environmental Impact
Antifoul is designed to kill marine organisms. This can have a significant negative impact on the environment, especially in sensitive marine areas. Many marinas now restrict the use of antifoul due to environmental concerns.
Reason 3: Maintenance and Efficiency
Antifoul can be difficult to maintain, and it may not always be effective. Over time, antifoul can wear away, allowing marine organisms to attach. This can reduce your boat's speed and efficiency.
Alternatives to Antifoul
If you're looking for alternatives to antifoul, consider these options:
Lift Systems: These systems allow you to lift your boat out of the water regularly, preventing marine organisms from attaching.
Dry Storage: Storing your boat in a dry environment can also help prevent marine growth. We use the Fabdock system built here on the Gold Coast
Conclusion
While antifoul is a common choice for many boat owners, there are valid reasons why we prefer not to use it on Antoinette. The cost, environmental impact, and potential maintenance issues associated with antifoul make it a less desirable option for us. By considering alternatives like lift systems or dry storage, we can protect our boat from marine growth without harming the environment.
Comments